Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

NoOneMan

(4,795 posts)
10. Or even plateau
Tue Dec 18, 2012, 02:30 PM
Dec 2012

There is some slight common sense to what he is saying, but I don't think that they are fully considering what it would entail. In order to make low-yield land in 3rd world countries increase yields significantly, they would likely rely on developed nations' farming practices: heavy machinery, evasive soil management, water-intensive irrigation, petro-derived fertilizers, etc. So, what are the secondary implications of engaging in a second "green revolution" as far as our environment is concerned (and how will those consequences reciprocally impact future yields globally?).

I don't think a study about future agriculture that doesn't account for the ecological impact of climate change can be taken seriously. I find it suspect that this study is so widely reported upon.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»'Peak Farmland' Is Here, ...»Reply #10