Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

AlecBGreen

(3,874 posts)
10. no that is also unnecessary
Thu Jan 10, 2013, 10:30 PM
Jan 2013

Last edited Thu Jan 10, 2013, 11:15 PM - Edit history (1)

First off, there was an article today confirming what we already know to be true: up to half of all harvested food is wasted. It is never eaten. It rots, it is eaten by vermin, or it is rejected by supermarkets for superficial blemishes. Capturing even a fraction of that would get us a long way toward feeding the hungry.

2nd - Americas diet, and increasingly that of China, is geared toward monocropping grain for feeding cattle, poultry and swine. That is an inefficient use of resources. The feed:meat conversion ratio for confinement cattle is around 7:1, meaning it takes 7 calories of vegetable protein to gain us one pound of meat. That is extremely wasteful.

3rd - The largest irrigated crop in America is sod. Lawns. It occupies THREE TIMES the area that all the corn in America does. Think on that for a minute. How many gardens could be planted in that space? During WWII, 40% of all household food was grown at home. We can do it again.

4th - Agriculture can go up, not just out. Fruit & nut trees take up little space compared to the food they produce. Cool-season and shade-tolerant plants can be planted in the understory.

5th - Discounting lawns, misused monocropped fields, and verticulte agriculture, there is a large amount of 'wasted' space in road medians, right of ways, etc. Go to Europe or Asia and you see food planted all over the place. This is how China, with 4 times our population and ONE TENTH the arable land has been able to feed itself for millenia.

6th - feed household scraps to egg layers. If every person in America fed their table scraps to a few hens instead of landfilling them, we would not need a single confinement egg factory. Not one.

There are more but that should suffice for now. We can feed the global population without GMOs and without tearing up virgin savannah.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I'll still skip as much GM stuff as I can, thanks very much. djean111 Jan 2013 #1
Safer for you Nederland Jan 2013 #4
So why be afraid to label GM? Downwinder Jan 2013 #2
Propaganda much? RC Jan 2013 #3
Once learning of horizontal gene transfer I haven't cared much about GMOs. joshcryer Jan 2013 #5
GMOs are unnecessary to feed the human population AlecBGreen Jan 2013 #6
I disagree. Geoagriculture would be much more difficult without GMOs. joshcryer Jan 2013 #7
True Nederland Jan 2013 #8
no that is also unnecessary AlecBGreen Jan 2013 #10
All true Nederland Jan 2013 #11
why wait? AlecBGreen Jan 2013 #12
And opposing GM crops? Nederland Jan 2013 #14
This would all require we changed our habits NoOneMan Jan 2013 #13
Kinda funny here FogerRox Jan 2013 #9
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»This message was self-del...»Reply #10