Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cary

(11,746 posts)
11. I meant only to highlight our own arrogance and stupdity as a species.
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 01:51 PM
Jan 2013

I am sure you understand.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

The planet is not in lousy shape. Cary Jan 2013 #1
"Planet" is a shorthand for the biosphere. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #5
I meant only to highlight our own arrogance and stupdity as a species. Cary Jan 2013 #11
Oh yes. I know what we are. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #12
Ah, the big picture. wtmusic Jan 2013 #6
"The problem of industrialization" - not accepting your premise. wtmusic Jan 2013 #2
Well, there you go then! GliderGuider Jan 2013 #3
That's the best you can do? wtmusic Jan 2013 #4
I see no point in arguing - would I be able to change your opinion? GliderGuider Jan 2013 #7
Well, I try to keep an open mind. wtmusic Jan 2013 #9
Yeah, I got reactive in my reply there, sorry. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #10
"At least until some other source provides us with a better power return..." NoOneMan Jan 2013 #14
That feels a lot like the crux of the dilemma to me. nt GliderGuider Jan 2013 #17
If it makes you feel any better, GliderGuider Jan 2013 #8
Agree. We should have powered the industrial revolution with fairy powder NoOneMan Jan 2013 #13
Here's the problem as I see it GliderGuider Jan 2013 #15
If civilization is not, why are we here today and why can't we stop it? NoOneMan Jan 2013 #16
I think that's the thing most people don't understand. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #18
Oil powered the industrial revolution? wtmusic Jan 2013 #21
Sorry, I meant to type "fossil fuels" NoOneMan Jan 2013 #22
I know...oil, coal, nuclear, all that progress shit. wtmusic Jan 2013 #23
Define progress NoOneMan Jan 2013 #24
I'd have to pick "B" wtmusic Jan 2013 #25
I'm not sure how much we have made then (if any at all) NoOneMan Jan 2013 #27
Life expectancy is a pretty good indicator of the human condition wtmusic Jan 2013 #28
I don't really think that has a clear relationship to happiness and suffering. NoOneMan Jan 2013 #29
Google "life expectancy well-being" and you will find overwhelming evidence wtmusic Jan 2013 #30
I'm not really using an established western definition of "well-being" to be honest NoOneMan Jan 2013 #31
I'm using the UN's definition. wtmusic Jan 2013 #32
Are they the authority on human happiness? NoOneMan Jan 2013 #33
Please, define happiness however you like. wtmusic Jan 2013 #34
So your answer is "yes"? All our improved happiness (if we have any) is worth climate change? NoOneMan Jan 2013 #35
Yes, it's worth a certain amount. wtmusic Jan 2013 #36
Then screw climate change. Lets focus on promoting happiness NoOneMan Jan 2013 #37
I don't really need to point out the false dichotomy wtmusic Jan 2013 #38
There is no reason to not throw in the towel NoOneMan Jan 2013 #39
BTW, do you realize every environtmental disaster can now be written off? NoOneMan Jan 2013 #40
The problem is, happiness does not correlate with technology GliderGuider Jan 2013 #41
"I find that comforting" NoOneMan Jan 2013 #42
Our brains didn't evolve to assess risks far into the future. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #43
You've jumped the shark. wtmusic Jan 2013 #44
Actually I'm not going to tell anyone what does or doesn't make them happy. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #45
Population vs Consumption, ... CRH Jan 2013 #19
The Black Queen and leaky fuctions Iterate Jan 2013 #20
Both are killing the planet. (nt) NYC_SKP Jan 2013 #26
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Laying Blame: Population ...»Reply #11