Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Laying Blame: Population vs. Consumption [View all]NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)24. Define progress
Do you mean that which accelerates the velocity of energy in the system, to fuel exponential growth at any cost?
Or that which increases the aggregate happiness of all humans without threatening our future survival?
Or....?
Sometimes its interesting that people believe we are making substantial "progress" but cannot really objectively define it or prove that it is a "good" thing as far as all humans are concerned. Its just something people "believe" in, something that will save us from ourselves, and something that will bring everyone closer to Utopia. Its a very abstract form of religion in some people (I am not suggesting you are one of those).
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't really think that has a clear relationship to happiness and suffering.
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#29
I'm not really using an established western definition of "well-being" to be honest
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#31
So your answer is "yes"? All our improved happiness (if we have any) is worth climate change?
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#35
Actually I'm not going to tell anyone what does or doesn't make them happy.
GliderGuider
Jan 2013
#45