Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Laying Blame: Population vs. Consumption [View all]wtmusic
(39,166 posts)30. Google "life expectancy well-being" and you will find overwhelming evidence
the two are correlated, not only physiologically but psychologically. There is absolutely no question that overall, we're living longer, happier, healthier lives because of technology and "industrialization".
We've bumped rather suddenly against limits we never knew existed 50 years ago, but it's also worthwhile to note that the percentage of people in the world who qualify as "undernourished" has been halved in that same amount of time. That's a tremendous accomplishment, and one that should give us hope that climate targets are within reach.
Should.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't really think that has a clear relationship to happiness and suffering.
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#29
I'm not really using an established western definition of "well-being" to be honest
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#31
So your answer is "yes"? All our improved happiness (if we have any) is worth climate change?
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#35
Actually I'm not going to tell anyone what does or doesn't make them happy.
GliderGuider
Jan 2013
#45