Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Laying Blame: Population vs. Consumption [View all]wtmusic
(39,166 posts)44. You've jumped the shark.
You're going to tell someone who says they're happy that they're not "really" happy, because of some outlier study from the English Midlands (they ought to at least get a chuckle out of that)?
There's a lot of technology behind that bowl of grain - as I mentioned earlier, the percent of undernourished people in the world has been cut in half by technology. 2/3 of the world's food supply is the direct result of Haber-Bosch nitrogen fixing.
I know, I know. All of those happy, well-fed people are actually miserable, and would gladly give their lives so that existentialist posters on DU might post another day...
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't really think that has a clear relationship to happiness and suffering.
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#29
I'm not really using an established western definition of "well-being" to be honest
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#31
So your answer is "yes"? All our improved happiness (if we have any) is worth climate change?
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#35
Actually I'm not going to tell anyone what does or doesn't make them happy.
GliderGuider
Jan 2013
#45