Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Laying Blame: Population vs. Consumption [View all]GliderGuider
(21,088 posts)45. Actually I'm not going to tell anyone what does or doesn't make them happy.
I'd much rather ask them.
There isn't necessarily a lot of technology behind that bowl of grain. A lot of grain can be grown without the intervention of Mssrs. Haber und Bosch. It might even have been organic.
And no, I don't think one brand of technocratic Progress For All is what it takes to make the world happy. It may not be making all of us unhappy, but I've noticed a distinct rise in the level of alienation over the last 50 years in the parts of the world I've traveled in. I don't think that would happen if people go happier and happier from faster internet connections and iPhones.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
45 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
I don't really think that has a clear relationship to happiness and suffering.
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#29
I'm not really using an established western definition of "well-being" to be honest
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#31
So your answer is "yes"? All our improved happiness (if we have any) is worth climate change?
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#35
Actually I'm not going to tell anyone what does or doesn't make them happy.
GliderGuider
Jan 2013
#45