Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Sky-High Radiation Found in Fukushima Fish [View all]longship
(40,416 posts)27. Straw man speaking there. Updated.
Science does inform with facts. But what science does most importantly, is ask questions. Both the facts -- the data -- and the questions are equally important.
Please resist the temptation to portray science as some monolithic, unchanging enterprise. It just isn't so.
I cannot think of any expression of the ideals of science more than those expressed by humanist-mathematician Jacob Bronowski in his BBC/PBS series, The Ascent of Man. It forms the capstone of the episode entitled, Knowledge or Certainty. Here it is:
And, for those who cannot view it all, here is what he said:
There are two parts to the human dilemma. One is the belief that the ends justifies the means, that push button philosophy, that deliberate deafness to suffering has become the monster in the war machine. The other is the betrayal of the human spirit, the assertion of dogma that closes the mind and turns nations and civilizations into a regiment of ghosts -- obedient ghosts or tortured ghosts.
It's said that science will dehumanize people and turn them into numbers. That's false, tragically false. Look for yourself. This is the concentration camp and crematorium at Auschwitz. This is where people were turned into numbers. Into this pond were flushed the ashes of some four million people. And that was not done by gas. It was done by arrogance, it was done by dogma, it was done by ignorance. When people believe that they have absolute knowledge, with no test in reality, this is how they behave. This is what men do when they aspire to the knowledge of gods.
Science is a very human form of knowledge. We are always at the brink of the known; we always feel forward for what is to be hoped. Every judgment in science stands on the edge of error and is personal. Science is a tribute to what we can know although we are fallible. In the end, the words were said by Oliver Cromwell: "I beseech you in the bowels of Christ: Think it possible you may be mistaken."
I owe it as a scientist to my friend Leo Szilard, I owe it as a human being to the many members of my family who died here, to stand here as a survivor and a witness. We have to cure ourselves of the itch for absolute knowledge and power. We have to close the distance between the push-button order and the human act. We have to touch people.
It's said that science will dehumanize people and turn them into numbers. That's false, tragically false. Look for yourself. This is the concentration camp and crematorium at Auschwitz. This is where people were turned into numbers. Into this pond were flushed the ashes of some four million people. And that was not done by gas. It was done by arrogance, it was done by dogma, it was done by ignorance. When people believe that they have absolute knowledge, with no test in reality, this is how they behave. This is what men do when they aspire to the knowledge of gods.
Science is a very human form of knowledge. We are always at the brink of the known; we always feel forward for what is to be hoped. Every judgment in science stands on the edge of error and is personal. Science is a tribute to what we can know although we are fallible. In the end, the words were said by Oliver Cromwell: "I beseech you in the bowels of Christ: Think it possible you may be mistaken."
I owe it as a scientist to my friend Leo Szilard, I owe it as a human being to the many members of my family who died here, to stand here as a survivor and a witness. We have to cure ourselves of the itch for absolute knowledge and power. We have to close the distance between the push-button order and the human act. We have to touch people.
That, DUers, expresses what science is about.
On edit: I am tempted to post this as an OP, given the lesson that Bronowski is relating here, is one we should never forget. Even here, I see ones who do not see what's important.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
64 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
When exactly is this going to be deemed a global threat? Wonder when the cancer rates will show
mother earth
Jan 2013
#2
Sounds like you'd be a great help to the Japanese gov't...dump everything into the ocean, our work
mother earth
Jan 2013
#14
You are assuming that ocean currents don't exist and sea life does not move around.
kestrel91316
Jan 2013
#51
Rep. Markey wrote an excellent letter to NOAA and the FDA asking pertinent questions...
PearliePoo2
Jan 2013
#4
Another WTF???!!? Adding radiation into the deadly mix isn't helping the planet or humanity.
mother earth
Jan 2013
#15
Maybe your number is applicable today, but the worst of it is yet to be realized IMHO. I think
mother earth
Jan 2013
#20
Whether people invest in solar, wind or nuclear, the profit motive is always involved
wtmusic
Jan 2013
#23
The risks for nuclear power are far too great, and the companies in charge of the sites are
mother earth
Jan 2013
#24
You forgot how "scientists" can be stifled & paid off, or must answer to the corporate sponsor or
mother earth
Jan 2013
#40
BS, tell that to those that GWB enlisted for his agenda, climate deniers...sorry, YOU have it wrong.
mother earth
Jan 2013
#43
Spare me your long winded comparisons & try to be succinct. You are writing off alternatives when
mother earth
Jan 2013
#49
Alternative energy is within the realms of science. You are just being ignorant to say it isn't.
mother earth
Jan 2013
#52
I probably have, but since this OT is about Fukushima, I didn't bring up these other issues as you
mother earth
Jan 2013
#21