Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
27. But we're *human beings*!
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 12:27 PM
Jan 2013

Overshoot doesn't apply to us, just to non-sapient animals!

Wait, what?

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

It's Not Nice To Fool With Mother Nature cantbeserious Jan 2013 #1
At the risk of PATRICK Jan 2013 #2
Actually there's a good reason for that. caseymoz Jan 2013 #5
Ehrlich's Population Bomb pscot Jan 2013 #15
We were already beyond the limits of sustainability caseymoz Jan 2013 #16
The population bomb was *temporarily* defused by the GR. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #17
No internal constraints? Nederland Jan 2013 #20
It's called overshoot NickB79 Jan 2013 #26
But we're *human beings*! GliderGuider Jan 2013 #27
Exactly Nederland Jan 2013 #30
"You believe" it makes the analogies invalid. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #32
True, and I provided an explanation for my beliefs Nederland Jan 2013 #36
Using that reasoning, I cannot fathom why any past civilization has collapsed NoOneMan Jan 2013 #40
I think both are only partially true. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #43
Previous civilizations were not global... Nederland Jan 2013 #46
By the same token, I'm just saying GliderGuider Jan 2013 #50
A distinction without a difference? Nederland Jan 2013 #54
Yes GliderGuider Jan 2013 #58
You need to get up to date Nederland Jan 2013 #89
"most did not collapse from lack of food" NoOneMan Jan 2013 #59
Radically different how? NickB79 Jan 2013 #33
These ways Nederland Jan 2013 #34
"in a way that ensures that adjustments will be made..." NoOneMan Jan 2013 #39
Humans have always been exceptional. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #44
Market forces will replace the Laurentian Shield with 24-36" of rich, loamy topsoil . . . hatrack Jan 2013 #45
This message was self-deleted by its author Nederland Jan 2013 #49
Where does that pic come from? Nederland Jan 2013 #47
That's a BBC article using data now published from Ortiz of Cimmyt NoOneMan Jan 2013 #51
Did you actually read the article? Nederland Jan 2013 #55
Ortiz, the author, is a research agronomist for CIMMYT GliderGuider Jan 2013 #56
That paper only deals with wheat Nederland Jan 2013 #60
Wiggle much? GliderGuider Jan 2013 #62
This guy says much the same: NoOneMan Jan 2013 #64
You are the one that is shifting the goalposts Nederland Jan 2013 #67
That question has been answered already. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #68
By which post? (nt) Nederland Jan 2013 #70
By this one GliderGuider Jan 2013 #71
How many times do you have to make the same mistake? Nederland Jan 2013 #72
The issue is the productivity and utility of the plants that might be substituted. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #81
One could ask you the same question. Nihil Jan 2013 #93
Agreed, but now follow through Nederland Jan 2013 #94
What, you've never heard of groupthink? GliderGuider Jan 2013 #95
Primarily, but maize is mentioned NoOneMan Jan 2013 #63
A peer review look at the issue Nederland Jan 2013 #52
"Climate change is expected to increase yields" NoOneMan Jan 2013 #57
BTW, did anyone else notice those articles were from 1994 and 1999? NoOneMan Jan 2013 #61
Good catch Nederland Jan 2013 #73
Except those recent food scarcity studies directly contradict your lies NoOneMan Jan 2013 #74
And yet time and time again, the animal model,... TheMadMonk Jan 2013 #66
There is no edge Nederland Jan 2013 #28
You're ignoring topsoil depletion NickB79 Jan 2013 #31
No I'm not Nederland Jan 2013 #35
So, the Invisible Hand then? NickB79 Jan 2013 #37
Massive collapse? Nederland Jan 2013 #38
"create an enormous incentive to"...feed the people with the wealth to pay for the resource NoOneMan Jan 2013 #41
I agree Nederland Jan 2013 #48
The nation of "let them die" as a healthcare platform (still) will feed its poor? NoOneMan Jan 2013 #53
News Flash: The Poor are Already Dying Nederland Jan 2013 #69
At the apex of agrarian civilization, with mild headwinds NoOneMan Jan 2013 #75
What is your point? Nederland Jan 2013 #78
That its not going to be an uphill ride NoOneMan Jan 2013 #80
That's one hell of a paper you found. GliderGuider Jan 2013 #82
Deja Vu Nederland Jan 2013 #83
Climate change is "the same old tripe"? NoOneMan Jan 2013 #84
Posted in the wrong place? Nederland Jan 2013 #86
So temperature increases will not bring harm (doom) to some people? NoOneMan Jan 2013 #88
Harm yes, doom no (nt) Nederland Jan 2013 #90
So when studies suggest that 3 billion face famine, or entire countries will be underwater NoOneMan Jan 2013 #91
Over what time frame? Nederland Jan 2013 #92
So how was lunch with Julian Simon? GliderGuider Jan 2013 #85
Good. He paid with the money he won betting Paul Ehrlich Nederland Jan 2013 #87
And wasted by those self same peoples. TheMadMonk Jan 2013 #65
The 'Green Revolution' did not defuse the Population Bomb Nederland Jan 2013 #19
So Norman Borlaug didn't deserve a Nobel Prize after all? GliderGuider Jan 2013 #22
He certainly deserved it Nederland Jan 2013 #23
No, you said "The Green Revolution did not defuse the Population Bomb". GliderGuider Jan 2013 #25
There is a population problem Nederland Jan 2013 #29
They have always emphasized that their estimates are conservative. Downwinder Jan 2013 #6
Lord Stark warns us that winter is coming. RadiationTherapy Jan 2013 #3
Yes, Winter is Comin' (love that show) tavalon Jan 2013 #7
Great point! dreamnightwind Jan 2013 #21
D'oh Berlum Jan 2013 #4
It's not planetary fail, though tavalon Jan 2013 #8
"The earth is an organism, and that organism has a skin; that skin has diseases... alterfurz Jan 2013 #12
I've never been compared to Nietzsche tavalon Jan 2013 #13
I think you're supposed to feel pscot Jan 2013 #18
It's easier than thinking. Fuddnik Jan 2013 #9
Seriously, if I hear "it's in God's hands" once more mountain grammy Jan 2013 #11
Nice pic Nederland Jan 2013 #24
"climate change advocates aren't being taken seriously" NoOneMan Jan 2013 #42
I see Nederland Jan 2013 #76
He's "talking" about it now NoOneMan Jan 2013 #77
Sure, now that he's never running again... (nt) Nederland Jan 2013 #79
Once again, It is the bean counters sounding alarm, ... CRH Jan 2013 #10
well that sucks. nt limpyhobbler Jan 2013 #14
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Nicholas Stern: 'I got it...»Reply #27