Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse' [View all]Nederland
(9,979 posts)52. A peer review look at the issue
http://ecoethics.net/cyprus-institute.us/PDF/Rosensweig-Food-Supply.pdf
Whereas production in the developed world benefitted from climate change, production in developing nations declined.
This seems to contradict your pic which makes it seem as if the US would be negatively impacted.
And also this one, which basically reaches the same conclusion:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378099000187
Building on previous work quantitative estimates of climate change impacts on global food production have been made for the UK Hadley Centre's HadCM2 greenhouse gas only ensemble experiment and the more recent HadCM3 experiment (Hulme et al., 1999). The consequences for world food prices and the number of people at risk of hunger as defined by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO, 1988) have also been assessed. Climate change is expected to increase yields at high and mid-latitudes, and lead to decreases at lower latitudes. This pattern becomes more pronounced as time progresses. The food system may be expected to accommodate such regional variations at the global level, with production, prices and the risk of hunger being relatively unaffected by the additional stress of climate change. By the 2080s the additional number of people at risk of hunger due to climate change is about 80 million people (±10 million depending on which of the four HadCM2 ensemble members is selected). However, some regions (particularly the arid and sub-humid tropics) will be adversely affected. A particular example is Africa, which is expected to experience marked reductions in yield, decreases in production, and increases in the risk of hunger as a result of climate change. The continent can expect to have between 55 and 65 million extra people at risk of hunger by the 2080s under the HadCM2 climate scenario. Under the HadCM3 climate scenario the effect is even more severe, producing an estimated additional 70+ million people at risk of hunger in Africa.
Whereas production in the developed world benefitted from climate change, production in developing nations declined.
This seems to contradict your pic which makes it seem as if the US would be negatively impacted.
And also this one, which basically reaches the same conclusion:
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0959378099000187
Building on previous work quantitative estimates of climate change impacts on global food production have been made for the UK Hadley Centre's HadCM2 greenhouse gas only ensemble experiment and the more recent HadCM3 experiment (Hulme et al., 1999). The consequences for world food prices and the number of people at risk of hunger as defined by the Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO, 1988) have also been assessed. Climate change is expected to increase yields at high and mid-latitudes, and lead to decreases at lower latitudes. This pattern becomes more pronounced as time progresses. The food system may be expected to accommodate such regional variations at the global level, with production, prices and the risk of hunger being relatively unaffected by the additional stress of climate change. By the 2080s the additional number of people at risk of hunger due to climate change is about 80 million people (±10 million depending on which of the four HadCM2 ensemble members is selected). However, some regions (particularly the arid and sub-humid tropics) will be adversely affected. A particular example is Africa, which is expected to experience marked reductions in yield, decreases in production, and increases in the risk of hunger as a result of climate change. The continent can expect to have between 55 and 65 million extra people at risk of hunger by the 2080s under the HadCM2 climate scenario. Under the HadCM3 climate scenario the effect is even more severe, producing an estimated additional 70+ million people at risk of hunger in Africa.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse' [View all]
xchrom
Jan 2013
OP
Market forces will replace the Laurentian Shield with 24-36" of rich, loamy topsoil . . .
hatrack
Jan 2013
#45
The issue is the productivity and utility of the plants that might be substituted.
GliderGuider
Jan 2013
#81
"create an enormous incentive to"...feed the people with the wealth to pay for the resource
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#41
The nation of "let them die" as a healthcare platform (still) will feed its poor?
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#53
So when studies suggest that 3 billion face famine, or entire countries will be underwater
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#91
"The earth is an organism, and that organism has a skin; that skin has diseases...
alterfurz
Jan 2013
#12