Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse' [View all]NoOneMan
(4,795 posts)80. That its not going to be an uphill ride
A freeze frame of the present reveals a civilization at the peak of its power. Within the
space of a few decades, humanity will have experienced peak population, peak oil, peak
water, peak land, and perhaps even peak crop yields. Yet, even at the height of power,
having taken virtual control of the biosphere and having turned the arable Earth into a vast
feeding lot for our species, it still has not been enough. In what amounts to the greatest
perpetual famine in human history, nearly three billion people are without proper food and
water; 850 million lack the minimal bodily requirements of protein and calories; half the
world is chronically deficient in at least one of the essential micronutrients; nine million
die each year from starvation and diseases of malnourishment. Now, with deteriorating
conditions of planetary forests, soil, water, oil, climate, and ecosystems, we are expecting
to improve the quality of life for billions of more people in the coming decades. There is a
flaw with the logic of our expectationsone which may well translate into billions of
additional malnourished people by mid-century, or, indeed, could even augur a painful
population crash
Population crash: prospects for famine in the twenty-first century
Received: 1 October 2008 / Accepted: 7 April 2009 / Published online: 6 May 2009
! Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse' [View all]
xchrom
Jan 2013
OP
Market forces will replace the Laurentian Shield with 24-36" of rich, loamy topsoil . . .
hatrack
Jan 2013
#45
The issue is the productivity and utility of the plants that might be substituted.
GliderGuider
Jan 2013
#81
"create an enormous incentive to"...feed the people with the wealth to pay for the resource
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#41
The nation of "let them die" as a healthcare platform (still) will feed its poor?
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#53
So when studies suggest that 3 billion face famine, or entire countries will be underwater
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#91
"The earth is an organism, and that organism has a skin; that skin has diseases...
alterfurz
Jan 2013
#12