Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse' [View all]Nederland
(9,979 posts)89. You need to get up to date
Climate change is now predicted to cause an increase in weather extremes: more precipitation in some areas, droughts in others. I'd have thought that as a scientifically inclined sort, the recent crop-affecting droughts in the US, China, SE Asia, Russia and Australia might be giving you pause.
As the most recent IPCC draft shows an almost complete reversal from AR4 on trends in drought, hurricanes, floods:
IPCC AR5 Draft: we have high confidence that natural variability dominates any AGW influence in observed/historical TC records
Draft IPCC Ch2 bottom line on extremes: generally low confidence that there have been discernable changes over the observed record on lack of trends in extremes, exceptions are trends seen in temperature extremes and regional precipitation (but not floods)
On XTCs unlike in AR4, it is assessed here..there is low confidence of regional changes in the intensity of extreme extratropical cyclones
Bottom line IPCC trop cyclones same as SREX: low confidence that any reported long term increases in tropical cyclone activity are robust
More IPCC draft Ch2 on trop cyclones: current datasets indicate no significant observed trends in global tropical cyclone frequency
IPCC on trop cyclones AR4 assessment needs to be somewhat revised with respect to the confidence levels associated with observed trends
IPCC draft Ch2 on drought: The current assessment does not support the AR4 conclusions regarding global increasing trends in droughts
More IPCC Ch2: low confidence regarding the sign of trend in the magnitude and/or frequency of floods on a global scale
More IPCC draft report: Ch2: there is currently no clear and widespread evidence for observed changes in flooding except timing of snowmelt
As the most recent IPCC draft shows an almost complete reversal from AR4 on trends in drought, hurricanes, floods:
IPCC AR5 Draft: we have high confidence that natural variability dominates any AGW influence in observed/historical TC records
Draft IPCC Ch2 bottom line on extremes: generally low confidence that there have been discernable changes over the observed record on lack of trends in extremes, exceptions are trends seen in temperature extremes and regional precipitation (but not floods)
On XTCs unlike in AR4, it is assessed here..there is low confidence of regional changes in the intensity of extreme extratropical cyclones
Bottom line IPCC trop cyclones same as SREX: low confidence that any reported long term increases in tropical cyclone activity are robust
More IPCC draft Ch2 on trop cyclones: current datasets indicate no significant observed trends in global tropical cyclone frequency
IPCC on trop cyclones AR4 assessment needs to be somewhat revised with respect to the confidence levels associated with observed trends
IPCC draft Ch2 on drought: The current assessment does not support the AR4 conclusions regarding global increasing trends in droughts
More IPCC Ch2: low confidence regarding the sign of trend in the magnitude and/or frequency of floods on a global scale
More IPCC draft report: Ch2: there is currently no clear and widespread evidence for observed changes in flooding except timing of snowmelt
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
95 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Nicholas Stern: 'I got it wrong on climate change – it's far, far worse' [View all]
xchrom
Jan 2013
OP
Market forces will replace the Laurentian Shield with 24-36" of rich, loamy topsoil . . .
hatrack
Jan 2013
#45
The issue is the productivity and utility of the plants that might be substituted.
GliderGuider
Jan 2013
#81
"create an enormous incentive to"...feed the people with the wealth to pay for the resource
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#41
The nation of "let them die" as a healthcare platform (still) will feed its poor?
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#53
So when studies suggest that 3 billion face famine, or entire countries will be underwater
NoOneMan
Jan 2013
#91
"The earth is an organism, and that organism has a skin; that skin has diseases...
alterfurz
Jan 2013
#12