Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: TEPCO Rose [View all]FBaggins
(28,706 posts)33. Another thread you should review
http://www.democraticunderground.com/112737008
There are TONS of spent MOX (PLUTONIUM and URANIUM!!!) outside that core in the spent fuel pools. - Who knows where all that is today?
All of that is still sitting right there in the pools.
There are reports of plutonium at various places in Fukushima, as well as aerosilized plutonium over Europe.
But not chucks of plutonium. And not in amounts that could be associated with Fukushima other than right next to the plant.
One thing is for certain: No one in authority has made a public accounting of it all,
Sorry. That's simply wrong. Multiple authorities have made an accounting and the detected amounts are consistent with those estimates.
There are TONS of spent MOX (PLUTONIUM and URANIUM!!!) outside that core in the spent fuel pools. - Who knows where all that is today?
All of that is still sitting right there in the pools.
There are reports of plutonium at various places in Fukushima, as well as aerosilized plutonium over Europe.
But not chucks of plutonium. And not in amounts that could be associated with Fukushima other than right next to the plant.
One thing is for certain: No one in authority has made a public accounting of it all,
Sorry. That's simply wrong. Multiple authorities have made an accounting and the detected amounts are consistent with those estimates.
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
52 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
Lady Barbara Judge is the subject of the post. Do you have anything to add about her?
Octafish
Feb 2013
#13
She's not suggesting they are thinking about re-starting parts of the Dai-ichi plant is she?
AtheistCrusader
Feb 2013
#5
Her hiring may be a PR move of the first stank rather than as a professional fixer-upper.
Octafish
Feb 2013
#6
That paper was published in 2002. It's a good bet there's a lot more plutonium now.
Octafish
Feb 2013
#14