Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

kristopher

(29,798 posts)

6. We are able to deal with more than one issue at a time

Reply to GliderGuider (Reply #5)

Wed Feb 27, 2013, 08:31 PM

Feb 2013

The existence of the climate change problem doesn't negate the existence of other problems nor the need to deal with other problems.

It is textbook nuclear proponent arguing style to try to use climate change as a trump to derail any consideration of the problems associated with nuclear.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

In This Nuclear World, What Is the Meaning of "Safe"? [View all] kristopher Feb 2013 OP

Kris, the gig is up, man. Pam has exposed us. RobertEarl Feb 2013 #1

Please keep the call-outs confined to Meta XemaSab Feb 2013 #2

That is to be criticized, true. kristopher Feb 2013 #15

In This Fossil Fueled World, What Is the Meaning of "Safe"? GliderGuider Feb 2013 #3

Too bad you choose to belittle such a thoughtful balanced piece. kristopher Feb 2013 #4

I have nothing against shutting down nukes. GliderGuider Feb 2013 #5

We are able to deal with more than one issue at a time kristopher Feb 2013 #6

Why aren't you, then? GliderGuider Feb 2013 #7

Finally admitting your hidden agenda again... kristopher Feb 2013 #9

I give up. GliderGuider Feb 2013 #11

Answer one question - kristopher Feb 2013 #12

My position is that the world faces one clear and present danger. Fossil fuels. GliderGuider Feb 2013 #13

Yes I've heard that before - now please answer the question I asked. nt kristopher Feb 2013 #14

My answer GliderGuider Mar 2013 #16

That's your idea of a thoughtful balanced piece? FBaggins Mar 2013 #17

There is no 'safe' exposure to radiation RobertEarl Feb 2013 #8

Sorry, meant to post this instead RobertEarl Feb 2013 #10