Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
13. Well he's out of luck.
Sat Mar 2, 2013, 03:24 PM
Mar 2013

He's dead.

But even if he was still alive, why would I care if he rejected my view? Any more than I care if you do, or anyone else?

Let's say I don't tag Harris' name or connection to CM onto to it. Lets say I simply use the tripartite view of society (cherry-picked from Marx, just as Harris did) and the notion that humans do most of what we do to enable energy and resource acquisition down in the infrastructure, but I didn't say a word about Uncle Marvin. Would your opinion change? Because that's essentially what I've done.

We all cherry-pick ideas, after all - you, me, Marvin Harris and every other thinker under the sun. When we like what's been done with the cherries we call it intellectual progress. When we don't, we call it misappropriation...

ETA: You make a good point though. I think I'm at a point with this work where I can call a lot of it my own, and simply acknowledge Harris, Odum and Swenson as the source of some of the ideas.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Thermodynamic footprints [View all] GliderGuider Mar 2013 OP
Looks like good work. napoleon_in_rags Mar 2013 #1
My first thought is GliderGuider Mar 2013 #2
I think some of your statements, ... CRH Mar 2013 #3
Yes, you're seeing the humanist blockage up close and personal. GliderGuider Mar 2013 #4
I think we agree more than we disagree, ... CRH Mar 2013 #5
"reading this paper earlier in the week was the greatest "Eureka!" moment I've ever had in my life" kristopher Mar 2013 #6
Building an "integrated, holistic and thoughtful understanding" is exactly what I'm doing. GliderGuider Mar 2013 #7
This is what I see kristopher Mar 2013 #8
And I have no doubt that Swenson and Odum would think I'm bastardizing their work as well. GliderGuider Mar 2013 #9
Recall please... kristopher Mar 2013 #10
Yes, and in fact my view on determinism hasn't changed. GliderGuider Mar 2013 #11
No he isn't kristopher Mar 2013 #12
Well he's out of luck. GliderGuider Mar 2013 #13
You can't explain why Harris rejects your assertions regarding ... kristopher Mar 2013 #14
I don't make absolute assertions about that - at least not any more. GliderGuider Mar 2013 #15
Very nice. Ghost Dog Mar 2013 #16
I don't think it would be a violation. GliderGuider Mar 2013 #17
Eureka! I love that. napoleon_in_rags Mar 2013 #18
Sweet! GliderGuider Mar 2013 #19
Well, the boat can always get bigger. napoleon_in_rags Mar 2013 #20
I know what you mean. GliderGuider Mar 2013 #21
I relate to that actually. napoleon_in_rags Mar 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Thermodynamic footprints»Reply #13