Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
8. I'm not sure I agree with that reasoning
Wed Mar 6, 2013, 09:10 PM
Mar 2013

"not unreasonable in any other industry where larger volume purchases result in preferential pricing"

In the field of energy the act of discounting the cost to heavy users is part of a cycle that drives increased energy consumption and large system inefficiencies. It is tied to the fact that most utilities (here and abroad) are reimbursed on a cost plus basis. This gives an additional incentive for expansion.

A utility is motivated to build more capacity than they actually need, then they are motivated to discount the unused capacity in order to derive some sort of revenue. This promotes inefficient industrial expansion as heavy industry relies on the subsidized power rather than seeking efficiencies in their processes.

Raise the cost of power and the formula changes regarding how much it is worth spending on efficiency.

It is a common part of centralized thermal generation, and it is something we need to address if we are going to change the trajectory of energy use.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

This is almost tragic farce dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #1
That is a really peculiar spin you are putting on this information kristopher Mar 2013 #2
I'm not spinning anything dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #3
I'm afraid I don't see where you pointed out any facts. kristopher Mar 2013 #4
Some odd notes here dipsydoodle Mar 2013 #5
No, they're correct muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #7
Who is "they"? kristopher Mar 2013 #9
The assertions, that you called 'incorrect' (nt) muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #10
Those assertions are incorrect. kristopher Mar 2013 #11
Well, you would say that, wouldn't you? muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #12
Not only do I say that kristopher Mar 2013 #13
I quoted the news report muriel_volestrangler Mar 2013 #14
An act that totally fails to support your claim kristopher Mar 2013 #15
You're correct that industry frequently gets preferred pricing FBaggins Mar 2013 #6
I'm not sure I agree with that reasoning kristopher Mar 2013 #8
'cost plus', do you have a cite for that? quadrature Mar 2013 #18
Those are the same thing kristopher Mar 2013 #22
That's fine FBaggins Mar 2013 #19
Basically coming from French companies Yo_Mama Mar 2013 #20
We can always depend on you to provide balance with industry views kristopher Mar 2013 #21
so high electricity prices are good, or bad? nt quadrature Mar 2013 #16
"high" is relative, "good or bad" is subjective kristopher Mar 2013 #17
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»EU probes Germany's energ...»Reply #8