Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

hedda_foil

(16,986 posts)

1. This kind of idiocy seems to be the direct result of outsourcing government services.

Reply to xchrom (Original post)

Sat Mar 9, 2013, 10:56 AM

Mar 2013

Honestly, what are the odds of an environmental impact study not being done by an . Industry-friendly company if the expertise isn't maintained in house?

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

4 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

state's 'environmentally sound' assessment done by firms linked to transcanada, exxon, bp, kochs [View all] xchrom Mar 2013 OP

This kind of idiocy seems to be the direct result of outsourcing government services. hedda_foil Mar 2013 #1

Ergo it's not idiocy that created the policy. Jackpine Radical Mar 2013 #2

Oh, but I'm sure they were objective! Ha, NOT! mountain grammy Mar 2013 #3

k&r limpyhobbler Mar 2013 #4