Environment & Energy

PamW

(1,825 posts)

4. Thank You

Wed Jan 11, 2012, 10:28 AM

Jan 2012

Thank You for your link to this discussion.

It's good to see a good technical discussion between REAL SCIENTISTS, and not the ideologues that pass themselves off as scientists in order to gain credibility.

Contrary to one DU forum member's contention that everything possible in the field of nuclear energy has already been explored and none of it works; one sees here real scientists discussing real promises for future research.

PamW

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

What's at the forefront of reactor research? A must-read digest/discussion. [View all] wtmusic Jan 2012 OP

I'm all linked out for today... can you summarize: do the 3 agree with the listed text? txlibdem Jan 2012 #1

It's a link that doesn't summarize easily wtmusic Jan 2012 #2

Since Fossil Fuels currently receive $400B in subsidies worldwide that seems like a paltry sum txlibdem Jan 2012 #3

Thank You PamW Jan 2012 #4

You're welcome. wtmusic Jan 2012 #5

Brayton Cycle.. PamW Jan 2012 #7

You do realize that link disproves most of your hype... kristopher Jan 2012 #6

... Maslo55 Jan 2012 #8

Lack of understanding begets poor interpretation. PamW Jan 2012 #11

IFR Maslo55 Jan 2012 #9

IFR cont'd PamW Jan 2012 #10

In fairness to Clinton wtmusic Jan 2012 #12

Actually... PamW Jan 2012 #13

A sodium fire closed a Japanese plant (Monju) for fifteen years wtmusic Jan 2012 #14

Then you don't know the negatives. PamW Jan 2012 #16

MSR doesn't have a record PamW Jan 2012 #17

2011 MIT meta-analysis on which nuclear technology is recommended kristopher Jan 2012 #15