HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Topics » Environment & Energy » Environment & Energy (Group) » Safer Nuclear Power, at H... » Reply #5

Response to Rhiannon12866 (Original post)

Wed Mar 13, 2013, 02:16 AM

5. Beware

June 5, 1953


Important decisions about the future development of atomic power must frequently be made by people who do not necessarily have an intimate knowledge of the technical aspects of reactors. These people are, nonetheless, interested in what a reactor plant will do, how much it will cost, how long it will take to build and how long and how well it will operate. When they attempt to learn these things, they become aware of confusion existing in the reactor business. There appears to be unresolved conflict on almost every issue that arises.

I believe that this confusion stems from a failure to distinguish between the academic and the practical. These apparent conflicts can usually be explained only when the various aspects of the issue are resolved into their academic and practical components. To aid in this resolution, it is possible to define in a general way those characteristics which distinguish the one from the other.

An academic reactor or reactor plant almost always has the following basic characteristics:
(1) It is simple.
(2) It is small.
(3) It is cheap.
(4) It is light.
(5) It can be built very quickly.
(6) It is very flexible in purpose (“omnibus reactor”).
(7) Very little development is required. It will use mostly “off-the-shelf” components.
(8) The reactor is in the study phases. It is not being built now.

On the other hand, a practical reactor plant can be distinguished by the following characteristics:
(1) It is being built now.
(2) It is behind schedule.
(3) It is requiring an immense amount of development on apparently trivial items. Corrosion, in particular, is a problem.
(4) It is very expensive.
(5) It takes a long time to build because of the engineering development problems.
(6) It is large.
(7) It is heavy.
(8) It is complicated.

The tools of the academic-reactor designer are a piece of paper and a pencil with an eraser. If a mistake is made, it can always be erased and changed. If the practical-reactor designer errs, he wears the mistake around his neck; it cannot be erased. Everyone can see it.

The academic-reactor designer is a dilettante. He has not had to assume any real responsibility in connection with his projects. He is free to luxuriate in the elegant ideas, the practical shortcomings of which can be relegated to the category of “mere technical details.” The practical-reactor designer must live with these same technical details. Although recalcitrant and awkward, they must be solved and cannot be put off until tomorrow. Their solutions require manpower, time and money.

Unfortunately for those who must make far-reaching decisions without the benefit of an intimate knowledge of reactor technology and unfortunately for the interested public, it is much easier to get the academic side of an issue than the practical side. For a large part those involved with the academic reactors have more inclination and time to present their ideas in reports and orally to those who will listen. Since they are innocently unaware of the real but hidden difficulties of their plans, [t]hey speak with great facility and confidence. Those involved with practical reactors, humbled by their experiences, speak less and worry more.

Yet it is incumbent on those in high places to make wise decisions, and it is reasonable and important that the public be correctly informed. It is consequently incumbent on all of us to state the facts as forthrightly as possible. Although it is probably impossible to have reactor ideas labelled as “practical” or “academic” by the authors, it is worthwhile for both the authors and the audience to bear in mind this distinction and to be guided thereby.


Hyman G. Rickover

Admiral Hyman G. Rickover, U.S. Navy, (27 January 1900 – 8 July 1986) was known as the "Father of the Nuclear Navy".

Reply to this post

Back to OP Alert abuse Link to post in-thread

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 34 replies Author Time Post
Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 OP
PoliticAverse Mar 2013 #1
Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 #2
guyton Mar 2013 #3
Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 #4
wtmusic Mar 2013 #11
kristopher Mar 2013 #13
FBaggins Mar 2013 #21
Fumesucker Mar 2013 #29
guyton Mar 2013 #30
LineReply Beware
kristopher Mar 2013 #5
Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 #6
kristopher Mar 2013 #7
Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 #8
jonthebru Mar 2013 #9
kristopher Mar 2013 #10
pscot Mar 2013 #27
wtmusic Mar 2013 #12
Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 #15
ladjf Mar 2013 #14
hunter Mar 2013 #17
ladjf Mar 2013 #18
hunter Mar 2013 #19
ladjf Mar 2013 #22
hunter Mar 2013 #24
Nihil Mar 2013 #28
FBaggins Mar 2013 #20
ladjf Mar 2013 #23
wtmusic Mar 2013 #25
ladjf Mar 2013 #31
FBaggins Mar 2013 #32
ladjf Mar 2013 #33
FBaggins Mar 2013 #34
NickB79 Mar 2013 #26
Cooley Hurd Mar 2013 #16
Please login to view edit histories.