Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

hunter

(38,302 posts)
19. Actually, the effects are longer lasting.
Wed Mar 13, 2013, 02:15 PM
Mar 2013

Last edited Thu Mar 14, 2013, 02:09 AM - Edit history (1)

It's going to take a long, long time (if ever) for the earth's climate to return to the icy "normal" we are familiar with.

After a few centuries of storage nuclear power plant waste is comparable to other commonly produced toxic industrial materials, not radically different than a pile of used tires, lead acid batteries, asbestos laced building materials, or many sorts of mine tailings. You don't want to go dumping it anywhere, but it's not going to kill you just looking at it like it would when it's first pulled out of the reactor.

That doesn't mean I support nuclear power. I'm a Luddite. I'd happily kill 80% of our industrial economy. You can forget your private automobiles, commercial air travel, air conditioning, and big box stores if Hunter ever becomes Emperor of Earth. Heck, I'd probably impose a universal speed limit of 35 m.p.h. for any vehicle that's not responding to an honest-to-god emergency. Someone had better be bleeding, on fire, or otherwise in danger of great bodily harm, else I take away your license to drive or fly forever. There would be no more car races and I wouldn't be sorry. Want to go fast? Buy a bicycle and peddle harder.

So sit down on the porch, relax, and enjoy an ice cold beer or lemon-aide from your solar powered refrigerator. You're not going anywhere, nor is their any reason to. Work's been canceled today because it's too hot.

Seriously, humans got into this mess by working too hard. What we now call "economic productivity" isn't really productive because we're busy destroying the environment that supports us.

Safer Nuclear Power, at Half the Price [View all] Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 OP
A video on the topic was also posted... PoliticAverse Mar 2013 #1
Don't know how I missed this! Thanks so much! Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 #2
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Mar 2013 #3
Makes sense to me... Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 #4
One of the advantages of the thorium cycle wtmusic Mar 2013 #11
Really? kristopher Mar 2013 #13
Yes... really. FBaggins Mar 2013 #21
Getting to the Sun from Earth is remarkably energy intensive Fumesucker Mar 2013 #29
This message was self-deleted by its author guyton Mar 2013 #30
Beware kristopher Mar 2013 #5
Thank you! Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 #6
At the sales stage they always sound great. kristopher Mar 2013 #7
I agree, may sound promising when still in the planning stage Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 #8
The liquid salt reactor, if implemented, could be a successful connection between jonthebru Mar 2013 #9
The future energy source is well known - renewables. kristopher Mar 2013 #10
Highly radioactive cooling salt pscot Mar 2013 #27
thanks for posting wtmusic Mar 2013 #12
You're welcome Rhiannon12866 Mar 2013 #15
Half the price but just as deadly to the human race. nt ladjf Mar 2013 #14
I dunno. Fossil fuels are pretty damned deadly, and getting deadlier. hunter Mar 2013 #17
Fossil fuels are very deadly, but the effects aren't as long lasting. However, the obvious answer ladjf Mar 2013 #18
Actually, the effects are longer lasting. hunter Mar 2013 #19
The negative effects of the Chernobyl will last for about 48,000 years. ladjf Mar 2013 #22
And the half life of mercury is forever. hunter Mar 2013 #24
You've got my vote! Nihil Mar 2013 #28
Why is it just as deadly? FBaggins Mar 2013 #20
The Chernobyl disaster will impact the environment for about 48,000 years. ladjf Mar 2013 #23
Sometimes the bullshit gets so thick you have to respond. wtmusic Mar 2013 #25
Thousands of posts on the INTERNET state that it will take about 48,000 years for all of the ladjf Mar 2013 #31
Oh! Why didn't you say so??? FBaggins Mar 2013 #32
‘Scientists don’t know why’: Cesium-137 in soil near Chernobyl has half-life of 180 to 320 years, ladjf Mar 2013 #33
That's just nuts. Sorry. FBaggins Mar 2013 #34
And CO2 will impact for 150,000 years or more NickB79 Mar 2013 #26
morning kick Cooley Hurd Mar 2013 #16
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Safer Nuclear Power, at H...»Reply #19