Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

gcomeau

(5,764 posts)
3. Oh come on.
Tue Apr 2, 2013, 12:17 PM
Apr 2013

"Intermittent sources like nuclear"? That statement made in favor of WIND?

You understand that there is a monumental difference between a plant going down for maintenance once every few decades and hoping every day that you happen to get a good breeze? I'm all for wind as a supplemental energy source but grow up and deal with reality.




Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»In California, Nuclear Tu...»Reply #3