Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
2. I'm giving this a rec without knowing much about this new mixing of fuels.
Sat Apr 6, 2013, 06:36 PM
Apr 2013

I know one thing, if population isn't going to stabilize for a number of years, and more people are wanting to live modern lifestyles (and who wouldn't since part of that means being healthy), then we've got to keep our minds open to all the possible energy conversion sources.

I still don't think we need to spend the money on this monumentally difficult nuclear scheme. The renewable ones seem to be cheaper to build. But I don't know what the lifetime of the fuel is for the Thorium reactors. It could be that the huge cooling facilities and other ancillary parts of these reactors are mortgaged down by the long term energy "production".

I don't know...

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Researchers discover conv...»Reply #2