Environment & Energy

cprise

(8,445 posts)

9. You seem to be arguing with someone else here, not me

Wed Apr 10, 2013, 10:04 PM

Apr 2013

1) I made no such assumption.

2) That is gibberish; try proofreading before posting.

3) Clearly you are trying to cop out here.

As long as we honestly recognize that opposing Keystone XL is nothing more than a gesture (and, in all probability, an empty gesture), then we're all on the same page.

By whose metrics or judgement? If its yours, then I'd very much like to invite you to hash this issue out with the regulars in the Environment & Energy forum.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

11 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Is the Keystone XL Pipeline the "Stonewall" of the Climate Movement? [View all] unhappycamper Apr 2013 OP

It's not nearly that noble. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #1

"Elsewhere" cprise Apr 2013 #2

You seriously believe that if XL Pipeline is not approved, Canada will stop production? Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #3

It makes tar sands product harder to get cprise Apr 2013 #5

The pipeline will represent a cost savings to Canada and more crude for US refineries. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #6

You're saying it doesn't matter how easy it is cprise Apr 2013 #7

Gotta love DU hyperbole. It never fails. Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #8

You seem to be arguing with someone else here, not me cprise Apr 2013 #9

LOL! Buzz Clik Apr 2013 #10

I dare you to point out where I made the assumption cprise Apr 2013 #11

China has a carbon tax like they have air pollution standards NickB79 Apr 2013 #4