Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
15. 2011 MIT meta-analysis on which nuclear technology is recommended
Sat Jan 14, 2012, 11:43 PM
Jan 2012

For the next several decades, light water reactors using the once-through fuel cycle are the preferred option for the U.S. (pg. 1)
(The "once-through fuel cycle" refers to uranium, not thorium - k)

LWRs (light water reactors) will be the primary reactor choice for many decades and likely the dominant reactor for the remainder of this century. (pg. 4)

Fuel cycle transitions require a half century or more. It is likely to be several decades before the U.S. deploys alternative fuel cycles. (pg. 5)

Our analysis of thorium versus uranium fuel cycles (appendix a) found advantages and disadvantages for both fuel cycles—but the differences were not sufficient to fundamentally alter conclusions. (pg. 17)

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»What's at the forefront o...»Reply #15