Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

PDJane

(10,103 posts)

1. Yes, of course.

Reply to limpyhobbler (Original post)

Tue Apr 16, 2013, 03:50 PM

Apr 2013

There are climate deniers in this administration, but I mostly think the push to get this moving before 2015 is the desire of harper to use the proceeds to ensure his re-election, with a majority.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Cooking the Books: The True Climate Impact of Keystone XL [View all] limpyhobbler Apr 2013 OP

Yes, of course. PDJane Apr 2013 #1

The "problem" isn't the pipeline, but the stuff it carries. GliderGuider Apr 2013 #2

The way to stop fossil fuel extraction is to fight fossil fuel extraction. limpyhobbler Apr 2013 #3

You're right that it's better to fight than do nothing GliderGuider Apr 2013 #4

The fact is that the current plan is to put the tar sands oil PDJane Apr 2013 #5