Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

PamW

(1,825 posts)
17. MSR doesn't have a record
Mon Jan 16, 2012, 03:52 PM
Jan 2012

Out of the 10 fast reactors that actually entered commercial service 1 has had a significant fire - not a great safety record.
===================================

MSR really doesn't have a record - the ONLY real reactor was MSRE.

MSRE operated for only 4 years; 1965 to 1969

EBR-II operated for 40 years without incident.

There's so little experience operating MSRs that you can't really say that just because you didn't have an accident in the 4 years that the single reactor operated, that is somehow better than EBR-II operating 10X as long, but then there is Monju.

Who knows what would have happened if the Japanese had built an MSR; they may have figured out a way to have an accident with that one too.

Both MSRs and IFR look to be very safe. However, with the extremely limited experience with MSRs; I don't think anyone can claim superior operational history over LMFBRs.

PamW

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»What's at the forefront o...»Reply #17