Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

NickB79

(20,286 posts)

10. In 1978, China had 950 million people

Reply to wtmusic (Reply #9)

Sun Apr 28, 2013, 12:40 AM

Apr 2013

Today, they have 1.35 BILLION: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_China

So, even with the most draconian government-enforced population controls ever implemented by a society that I have ever read of, their population grew by 400 million people in 40 years. Their policies only slowed the growth rate, rather than stabilizing it.

On the other hand, global human populations remained fairly stable for long periods of time when food supplies, war and disease were the primary limiting factors: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population#History

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

21 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nitrogen fertilizer is bad stuff — and not just because it could blow up your town [View all] xchrom Apr 2013 OP

The bad news can be overwhelming sometimes bloomington-lib Apr 2013 #1

It takes first-world blinders to see nitrogen fixation (Haber process) as anything but a miracle. wtmusic Apr 2013 #2

It is what made it possible to grow our population to 7+ billion NickB79 Apr 2013 #4

Actually sex is what made it possible. wtmusic Apr 2013 #5

So how have the other population controls worked out? NickB79 Apr 2013 #7

Wrong. wtmusic Apr 2013 #9

In 1978, China had 950 million people NickB79 Apr 2013 #10

The effect of China's program was one out of every two births was prevented. wtmusic Apr 2013 #11

Yes, it has been wildly successful NickB79 Apr 2013 #12

You would be willing to let members of your family starve to support this goal wtmusic Apr 2013 #13

An appeal to emotion fallacy NickB79 Apr 2013 #14

No, it isn't. wtmusic Apr 2013 #15

That's unfair pscot Apr 2013 #16

Let's ask Nick. wtmusic Apr 2013 #18

The thing is, Supply constraints may not be negotiable pscot Apr 2013 #19

so you're saying there is no environmental damage from nitrogen pollution? CreekDog Apr 2013 #8

nitrogen is not "green" wet.hen88 Apr 2013 #3

Meanwhile we send all our urine down the drain. eom roody Apr 2013 #6

I get it. ConcernedCanuk Apr 2013 #21

Unless you like starvation, it's wonderful stuff n/t Yo_Mama Apr 2013 #17

national geographic article wet.hen88 Apr 2013 #20