Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

NO, it doesn't sound crazy at all Demeter May 2013 #1
g'morning miss demeter xchrom May 2013 #2
That graph is nuts and requires explanation. It makes no sense at all. That cliff is bizarre. nt Bernardo de La Paz May 2013 #3
Agreed, it makes no sense at all, given what information exists in the thread at this point. Thor_MN May 2013 #4
from the article bloomington-lib May 2013 #5
That "explanation" makes no sense either Bernardo de La Paz May 2013 #9
Levelized Energy Cost is a thing, look it up Bradical79 May 2013 #14
But if the idea is to open eyes and change minds, then an off-putting graph is a clumsy tool Orrex May 2013 #15
LCOE is a standard metric used in the industry. FogerRox May 2013 #19
Read into the article for the explanation. TexasTowelie May 2013 #6
That shows a basic misunderstanding of finance. Nt naaman fletcher May 2013 #11
Capital cost? At a certain point the capital cost is recoupped. FogerRox May 2013 #20
I sure f&^*ing hope so! NoMoreWarNow May 2013 #7
I would think the operating cost of solar would make it the better choice alone liberal N proud May 2013 #8
Oh, but Duke Power will have to figure out a way to block the sun or djean111 May 2013 #10
A massive volcano The Wizard May 2013 #12
Yes, and engineered sulphation of the upper atmosphere is one way to cut back on Bernardo de La Paz May 2013 #17
Solar Capital Named Top Dividend Stock With Insider Buying and 10.63% Yield (SLRC) Katashi_itto May 2013 #13
I kind of agree Yo_Mama May 2013 #16
K&R. Yes please! Overseas May 2013 #18
The reason for the recent solar drop was China flooding the market NickB79 May 2013 #21
Wow! This is only the 9,876,543,210th such bit of soothsaying. Basically, wishful... NNadir May 2013 #22
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Solar Is Going To Change ...»Reply #18