Environment & Energy

Kolesar

(31,182 posts)

50. Before giving Davis-Besse another 20-year operating license,crack the case of the cracks:PDeditorial

Thu Jan 19, 2012, 03:29 PM

Jan 2012

Davis-Besse nuclear power plant now include mysterious hairline cracks in the outer concrete "shield building" around the reactor and its containment vessel.
These problems demand more than the usual ho-hum treatment from the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.

So the real mystery is why the NRC has let plant operator FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co., a subsidiary of Akron-based FirstEnergy Corp., power up the reactor before the utility completes its investigation into what caused the cracks.
...
Given the rocky operating history at Davis-Besse, on the Lake Erie shore near Toledo, and the large population living nearby, the NRC should have insisted on a root-cause report before permitting the plant to go back online. In 2002, the company's failure to check the lid of its nuclear reactor in a thorough and timely way allowed a gaping rust hole to grow unnoticed.
...
FirstEnergy wants to extend Davis-Besse's operating license to 2037 and has already applied for that 20-year extension. Davis-Besse's current license expires in 2017.
The reactor should not get a new lease on life until the NRC thoroughly analyzes its recent problems. Are the cracks an indicator of structural issues at Davis-Besse, making this plant too risky to operate for another two decades?

http://www.cleveland.com/opinion/index.ssf/2012/01/before_giving_davis-besse_anot.html

I am encouraged the the Plain Dealer would editorialize against First Energy. It had been that the PD was a mouthpiece for FE and the banks that did their financing dirty work for them.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

51 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

First Energy Davis Besse nuclear: cracks in the containment vessel to go with corrosion in the head [View all] Kolesar Dec 2011 OP

Here is a contribution with photos... kristopher Dec 2011 #1

Oh goody FBaggins Dec 2011 #2

So factual evidence is spam? madokie Dec 2011 #4

When posted over and over and over? Sure. FBaggins Dec 2011 #5

Facts never get old... Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #21

The thing with concrete is there is no difference between a hairline as they put it, or a big crack madokie Dec 2011 #3

Another corrosion photo wtmusic Dec 2011 #6

Could just as easily be corrosion due to inhalation of radioactive particles. diane in sf Dec 2011 #7

Actually, no. wtmusic Dec 2011 #8

Yes - that's why taxpayers have spent BILLIONS to compensate nuclear workers for radiation-induced jpak Dec 2011 #9

Nope (and capitalizing lies doesn't make them true) wtmusic Dec 2011 #10

I've posted on the TWO federal compensation programs many times here jpak Dec 2011 #11

The GOGLE and the GOGGLE both show more cancer deaths from coal. wtmusic Dec 2011 #12

I did your work for you - here's some links jpak Dec 2011 #13

wt where did you go madokie Dec 2011 #14

Please chime in, madokie wtmusic Dec 2011 #16

Only someone who is in denial about the dangers their pet project will ask that question madokie Dec 2011 #25

That's correct, no evidence can be found. wtmusic Dec 2011 #28

#1 Scientific method requires a claimant to back up their own claims wtmusic Dec 2011 #15

Ha! From nuclear weapons testing. wtmusic Dec 2011 #17

Nope - it includes workers in the nuclear fuel cycle - jpak Dec 2011 #18

All for nuclear weapons. wtmusic Dec 2011 #24

Sorry - the same enrichment plants that made HEU for bombs make fuel for commercial nukes jpak Dec 2011 #26

Since your post 3 Americans have died from coal pollution wtmusic Dec 2011 #27

Nope jpak Dec 2011 #29

Didn't do the work very well... PamW Jan 2012 #40

Despite the obvious logic... That won't fly here FBaggins Jan 2012 #41

I'm not responsible for their delusions PamW Jan 2012 #45

Those programs cover uranium miners and millers, and uranium enrichment plant workers jpak Jan 2012 #48

Bright shiny object thrown... Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #19

What's to 'take your eyes off'? wtmusic Dec 2011 #20

Bet you love flying... Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #22

Did someone die at Fukushima? wtmusic Dec 2011 #23

This is exactly the kind of disruption an effective host could end. kristopher Dec 2011 #30

What would you propose? joshcryer Dec 2011 #31

Per unit of energy generated, nuclear is the safest form of energy available wtmusic Dec 2011 #32

I disagree with all three statements. kristopher Dec 2011 #33

Fine, your disagreements are based on personal prejudice and not on fact. wtmusic Dec 2011 #34

When you remove a critical safety feature... Bob Wallace Dec 2011 #35

And when you refer to a hairline crack in millions of pounds of concrete... FBaggins Jan 2012 #43

The weight of the concrete has nothing to do with the fact that the concrete is in two pieces madokie Jan 2012 #44

It also shows a lack of engineering knowledge... PamW Jan 2012 #47

I understand that you support nuclear, but it is sad that your only response is a deflection` Kolesar Dec 2011 #37

First Energy Nuclear Operating Company Names Kendall Byrd Director of Engineering at Davis-Besse ... Kolesar Dec 2011 #36

Protesters stage skit before Davis-Besse hearing about cracks in the containment vessel Kolesar Jan 2012 #38

Don't know what caused the cracks, but don't worry, it's safe. kristopher Jan 2012 #39

You don't need to know what causes new hair to grow in your ears... FBaggins Jan 2012 #42

As you've told me.. PamW Jan 2012 #46

Environmental Coalition Challenges Davis-Besse License Extension on Shield Building Cracks Kolesar Jan 2012 #49

Before giving Davis-Besse another 20-year operating license,crack the case of the cracks:PDeditorial Kolesar Jan 2012 #50

See post #42 FBaggins Jan 2012 #51