Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
2. There is no equivalency between renewables and nuclear
Tue May 7, 2013, 12:45 PM
May 2013

The subsidies for renewables - which have totaled a very small fraction of those for nuclear - have resulted in a steadily declining cost curve that now positions renewables competitively with fossil fuels. The more we learn, the lower renewable energy costs go.

Nuclear, which has been far more heavily subsidized over decades, stands in stark contrast; presenting a steadily rising cost curve that has priced it out of the market. The more we learn, the more nuclear power costs.

The largest cost by far to my mind is the delay advocacy for nuclear is causing to the effort to transition away from fossil fuels. It is a strong crutch for the entire fossil fuel industry,.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Why the free market can't...»Reply #2