Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

kristopher

(29,798 posts)
5. Nuclear fan naysaying notwithstanding, this is an excellent report.
Mon May 13, 2013, 03:37 PM
May 2013

It is not reader friendly, but it looks to be a very realistic look at the factors driving investment and policy.

Comments from the Cult of Uranus would lead you to think that it is something on par with a high school book report. Of course, those same posters have been distorting everything about Germany's nuclear phase-out since day one, so they're at least being consistent.

One interesting tidbit that shows why they are working so hard to focus on the early stats. Referring to prior studies commissioned by Germany in 2010, they write: "The results of both studies depended heavily on the assumptions made on the german nuclear plant lifetime, i.e. longer nuclear plant lifetime leads to a quicker and more steady reduction of emissions from the energy sector, while nuclear plant shutdown results in a fast reduction of a higher emission level after 2020" pg 6.

You can download the original report with this link; it is well worth looking over.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/194335/Poyry_Report_-_Coal_fired_power_generation_in_Germany.pdf

DU Rec.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»No new coal in Germany, H...»Reply #5