Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)Cost of German Solar is Four Times Finnish Nuclear [View all]
Olkiluoto Nuclear Plant, Plagued by Budget Overruns, Still Beats Germanys Energiewende
Germanys solar program will generate electricity at quadruple the cost of one of the most expensive nuclear power plants in the world, according to a new Breakthrough Institute analysis, raising serious questions about a renewable energy strategy widely heralded as a global model.

The findings challenge the idea that solar photovoltaic is a disruptive, scalable, shelf-ready technology with a cost advantage over nuclear. Energy analysts frequently point to Finlands advanced nuclear project at Olkiluoto, which is seven years behind schedule and billions of dollars over budget, and solar in Germany as indicative of future cost trends working against new nuclear technologies and in favor of solar.
Proponents of Germanys Energiewende, which now involves jettisoning the countrys nuclear fleet by 2023, argue that solar and wind can make up the difference in lost capacity. A straightforward cost comparison between the two programs over the same 20-year period, however, reveals the costs of this proposition.
The Finnish European pressurized reactor (EPR), with an estimated total cost of $15 billion, will generate over half as much energy as the entire existing German solar program, which will run to roughly $130 billion. The total cost of electricity produced by German solar will be 32 cents per kilowatt-hour versus 7 cents per kilowatt-hour for the Areva-Siemens nuclear plant in Finland a more than four-fold difference. Two such nuclear plants would generate slightly more than Germanys solar panels, at less than a fourth the total cost.
...snip...
The reactor will generate about 225 TWh in a 20-year timeframe,3 more than half of what all of Germanys solar panels installed between 2000 and 2011 will generate over their 20-year feed-in tariff contracts.
http://thebreakthrough.org/index.php/programs/energy-and-climate/cost-of-german-solar-is-four-times-finnish-nuclear/
Germanys solar program will generate electricity at quadruple the cost of one of the most expensive nuclear power plants in the world, according to a new Breakthrough Institute analysis, raising serious questions about a renewable energy strategy widely heralded as a global model.

The findings challenge the idea that solar photovoltaic is a disruptive, scalable, shelf-ready technology with a cost advantage over nuclear. Energy analysts frequently point to Finlands advanced nuclear project at Olkiluoto, which is seven years behind schedule and billions of dollars over budget, and solar in Germany as indicative of future cost trends working against new nuclear technologies and in favor of solar.
Proponents of Germanys Energiewende, which now involves jettisoning the countrys nuclear fleet by 2023, argue that solar and wind can make up the difference in lost capacity. A straightforward cost comparison between the two programs over the same 20-year period, however, reveals the costs of this proposition.
The Finnish European pressurized reactor (EPR), with an estimated total cost of $15 billion, will generate over half as much energy as the entire existing German solar program, which will run to roughly $130 billion. The total cost of electricity produced by German solar will be 32 cents per kilowatt-hour versus 7 cents per kilowatt-hour for the Areva-Siemens nuclear plant in Finland a more than four-fold difference. Two such nuclear plants would generate slightly more than Germanys solar panels, at less than a fourth the total cost.
...snip...
The reactor will generate about 225 TWh in a 20-year timeframe,3 more than half of what all of Germanys solar panels installed between 2000 and 2011 will generate over their 20-year feed-in tariff contracts.
http://thebreakthrough.org/index.php/programs/energy-and-climate/cost-of-german-solar-is-four-times-finnish-nuclear/
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
well, even you have to admit that with increasing gains in storage technology all of these numbers
Tunkamerica
May 2013
#32
your casual dismissal of the problems with storing spent nuclear material would tell me everything
niyad
May 2013
#14
hmmm, not related. but the fact that they are wrong in one significant area tells me they
niyad
May 2013
#17
the people who lived near Chernobyl disagree about no economic cost when nuclear goes bad nt
msongs
May 2013
#19
There are only about 2 or 3 fully dismantled (commercial) reactors that I know of
Democracyinkind
May 2013
#36