Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
In reply to the discussion: Cost of German Solar is Four Times Finnish Nuclear [View all]kristopher
(29,798 posts)51. This is why the BI "study" is BS.
There is a reason that BI drew the boundaries of their propaganda as they did - in comprehensive analysis comparing the centralized nuke/fossil fuel thermal system with the distributed renewables system, the RE system always achieves our goals more rapidly, safely and economically than the alternative.
Solar is set to bring the same type of benefit to consumers as the technology matures.
With More Wind Energy, PJM Could Save Customers $7 Billion per Year
By Jeff Postelwait, Associate Editor, Electric Light & Power
May 10, 2013
Tulsa, OK -- The PJM Interconnection could save its customers $6.9 billion if it more than doubled the amount of wind energy it currently plans to build. This is according to a study by Americans for a Clean Energy Grid and Synapse Energy Economics.
By the end of 2012, about 3.4 percent of PJM's total installed capacity was generated from wind. Over the next 13 years, with the advent of renewable portfolio standards, states within the PJM system will expand their wind energy capacity to 11 percent of their total installed capacity.
Bob Fagan, an economist with Synapse Energy Economics who worked on the report, said in a conference call that the study allowed for a significant build-out of transmission to allow this proposed new wind energy development to flow throughout the grid.
"Most of the wind resource is in the eastern portion of PJM," Fagan said. "A significant transmission build-out will be required in the western part of PJM to bring this electricity to market."
A large portion of the consumer savings come in by phasing out fossil fuel-fired generation, particularly coal power, which...
By Jeff Postelwait, Associate Editor, Electric Light & Power
May 10, 2013
Tulsa, OK -- The PJM Interconnection could save its customers $6.9 billion if it more than doubled the amount of wind energy it currently plans to build. This is according to a study by Americans for a Clean Energy Grid and Synapse Energy Economics.
By the end of 2012, about 3.4 percent of PJM's total installed capacity was generated from wind. Over the next 13 years, with the advent of renewable portfolio standards, states within the PJM system will expand their wind energy capacity to 11 percent of their total installed capacity.
Bob Fagan, an economist with Synapse Energy Economics who worked on the report, said in a conference call that the study allowed for a significant build-out of transmission to allow this proposed new wind energy development to flow throughout the grid.
"Most of the wind resource is in the eastern portion of PJM," Fagan said. "A significant transmission build-out will be required in the western part of PJM to bring this electricity to market."
A large portion of the consumer savings come in by phasing out fossil fuel-fired generation, particularly coal power, which...
http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/article/2013/05/with-more-wind-energy-pjm-could-save-customers-7-billion-per-year?cmpid=WindNL-Thursday-May16-2013
Edit history
Please sign in to view edit histories.
Recommendations
0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):
72 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
RecommendedHighlight replies with 5 or more recommendations
well, even you have to admit that with increasing gains in storage technology all of these numbers
Tunkamerica
May 2013
#32
your casual dismissal of the problems with storing spent nuclear material would tell me everything
niyad
May 2013
#14
hmmm, not related. but the fact that they are wrong in one significant area tells me they
niyad
May 2013
#17
the people who lived near Chernobyl disagree about no economic cost when nuclear goes bad nt
msongs
May 2013
#19
There are only about 2 or 3 fully dismantled (commercial) reactors that I know of
Democracyinkind
May 2013
#36