Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sikofit3

(145 posts)
4. Yup
Fri May 17, 2013, 02:52 PM
May 2013

Your absolutely correct and this is not really brought up much so I am glad you did. They always say that the methane was there before they started drilling, which in part is correct however, they fail to mention that there are tests that can determine thermogenic methane which is caused from high pressure and heat as is associated with the deep shale they are drilling in as opposed to upper layers that hold organically decaying matter that also creates methane. The industry says that even with the signature determined they still can't pin it on their wells because it is usually found farther away and apparently the isotopes change when travelling distances. So much more testing needs to be done to get this under control.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Stable isotope signatures provide that information. Buzz Clik May 2013 #1
Yup sikofit3 May 2013 #4
The drilling could be causing a physical disruption of higher-level seams wtmusic May 2013 #7
This message was self-deleted by its author sikofit3 May 2013 #11
"occasionally bubbles up through cracks in the earth" Warren Stupidity May 2013 #2
Yes sikofit3 May 2013 #3
well if you water is not on fire, and then they put in a frack pad next door, and then your faucets limpyhobbler May 2013 #5
Exactly Champion Jack May 2013 #6
Thank you wtmusic May 2013 #8
I might has more sad if I hadn't seen the kid on the ATV... hunter May 2013 #9
LOL I was surprised too to see a 5-year old with his own ATV limpyhobbler May 2013 #10
And that the dad previously confronted them with a shotgun. FBaggins May 2013 #12
maybe but I'm not sure that changes the environmental impact question. limpyhobbler May 2013 #13
It caused me to question his honesty. FBaggins May 2013 #14
Beats me. Industry makes billion?s of money on this so those are the last people I would believe. nt limpyhobbler May 2013 #15
People make lots of money on wind farms too FBaggins May 2013 #16
You suspect people's faucets were already on fire and they just didn't say anything before? limpyhobbler May 2013 #17
I don't just "suspect". I know it for a fact. FBaggins May 2013 #18
So why were methane concentrations 17 times higher in water near frack pads? limpyhobbler May 2013 #19
Hard to say FBaggins May 2013 #20
Why are they exempt from the Clean Air Act, Clean Water Act, Safe Drinking Water Act, and CERCLA? limpyhobbler May 2013 #21
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»What the frack do we know...»Reply #4