Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

defacto7

(14,162 posts)
12. Interesting...
Sun May 19, 2013, 01:19 AM
May 2013

Yes, but that magnetic variation is a moving target. Not by much but changes happen and the global variation just increases the calculated differences. So pilots are using celestial navigation? That messes up my whole pilot training. (Which ain't all that much really) But talking to commercial pilots in the 90s, they were complaining about a 2 percent movement of the magnetic pole in a couple days which caused them to shift their charts to accommodate. The only celestial navigation I am acquainted with deals with the celestial or the ecliptic equators. Would charts actually have to define new coordinates simply because there is a .05 to .1 shift in the geo. axis? Why wouldn't the change be sufficient with a slight calculation alteration? We are not talking about the earth sliding 30 degrees, at least not in the next half millennium. And why would that effect the celestial coordinates? Is that directly connected to the earths lat/long grid? I'm rusty on this. Glad to hear input.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The North Pole moves as i...»Reply #12