Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Socialistlemur

(770 posts)
3. It depends on supply
Mon May 20, 2013, 03:49 PM
May 2013

I think shale gas must be more expensive than gas from other rocks, because its a new technology and they have to spend a lot of money fracking the wells. If they build an export facility then I suppose the price will go up because there will be less competition. This has pluses and minuses. Natural gas is greener than coal, and this means it sheds less CO2. But a higher price long term helps cut how much we use. And it encourages more drilling. I don't think in the big picture this news item makes a difference. Everytime something like this is announced people make noise. But it takes a very sharp eye to figure out if its good or bad. I think long term it's bad because we export gas we should use to reduce coal consumption. And if we export it and goes elsewhere then it puts CO2 in the air anyway.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»So much for the myth that...»Reply #3