Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
30. It is much worse than you think.
Fri May 31, 2013, 11:50 AM
May 2013

This will explain the "inexplicable" votes.

Democrats are willing to bravely support any progressive bill as long as there's no chance it can pass

"The primary tactic in this game is Villain Rotation. They always have a handful of Democratic Senators announce that they will be the ones to deviate this time from the ostensible party position and impede success, but the designated Villain constantly shifts, so the Party itself can claim it supports these measures while an always-changing handful of their members invariably prevent it. One minute, it’s Jay Rockefeller as the Prime Villain leading the way in protecting Bush surveillance programs and demanding telecom immunity;

the next minute, it’s Dianne Feinstein and Chuck Schumer joining hands and “breaking with their party” to ensure Michael Mukasey’s confirmation as Attorney General;

then it’s Big Bad Joe Lieberman single-handedly blocking Medicare expansion;

then it’s Blanche Lincoln and Jim Webb joining with Lindsey Graham to support the de-funding of civilian trials for Terrorists;

and now that they can’t blame Lieberman or Ben Nelson any longer on health care (since they don’t need 60 votes), Jay Rockefeller voluntarily returns to the Villain Role, stepping up to put an end to the pretend-movement among Senate Democrats to enact the public option via reconciliation.

http://www.salon.com/2010/02/23/democrats_34/


How much Leadership did THIS guy show before the vote?







Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I will donate to help fund campaign commercials getting this info out. nt Mojorabbit May 2013 #1
HUGE K & R !!! WillyT May 2013 #2
Elizabeth Warren and Sherrod Brown are among the 71. I'm shocked and pissed at the both of them.nt stillwaiting May 2013 #3
Warren's response blaze May 2013 #4
I had an e-mail from Elizabeth Warren that said... canoeist52 May 2013 #5
What other "pro consumer" standards? zeemike May 2013 #7
She's a new Senator and was probably told that...but why would the Sanders' KoKo May 2013 #8
Sounds like double-talk to me. nm rhett o rick May 2013 #9
Quite a few dems voted against it, including my Senator Durbin -- Not Good. n/t whathehell May 2013 #11
I was sad to see so many "friends" vote against this limpyhobbler May 2013 #24
The Mutant 71 support Multinational Corporations over Americans Berlum May 2013 #6
Well, we know which of the 100 take money from Monsanto..... blackspade May 2013 #10
Ok, I've got Bennet, voting for and Udall against. I admit to not knowing and will find out. mountain grammy May 2013 #12
Pretty funny how these Teapublican states righters don't want to recognize states rights.... marble falls May 2013 #13
Unconscionable. AzDar May 2013 #14
Major K&R n/t defacto7 May 2013 #15
Tammy Baldwin? Why would she vote for it? Lifelong Protester May 2013 #16
Hey, this is a "We're fucked" moment if there ever was one. Look at Elizabeth Warren's shitty... Poll_Blind May 2013 #17
Well I suppose she's earned the right to explain herself. limpyhobbler May 2013 #25
re:We Know Who You Are: 71 Senators Reject States’ Rights to Label GMOs allan01 May 2013 #18
I have had quite enough. SCVDem May 2013 #19
I'm with you on that. tblue May 2013 #22
i noticed that-no CA senators lunasun May 2013 #23
Damn! Damn! Damn! ReRe May 2013 #20
I don't get it... CoffeeCat May 2013 #21
Article VI, Section 2 Viking12 May 2013 #27
A lot of Dems have just shown their true colors, if there was any doubt. forestpath May 2013 #26
I responded to my Senator, Gillibrand Babel_17 May 2013 #28
If a liberal Senator thought there could be a problem with the bill's language: Babel_17 May 2013 #29
It is much worse than you think. bvar22 May 2013 #30
You are absolutely, positively right. It's been going on since BHO's first term. I saw it then. ancianita May 2013 #31
messed up doesn't begin to describe it. gejohnston May 2013 #32
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»We Know Who You Are: 71 S...»Reply #30