Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Not Sure

(735 posts)
12. Actually, moving asphalt by rail is very common
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 04:35 PM
Jun 2013

It is often handled in 20,000-25,000 gallon tank cars. The product is shipped at an elevated temperature, to enable the material to be unloaded from the car. It can be reheated at the delivery site for unloading if the load was not moved as an expedited shipment.

If this material has to be transported at all, I think rail is the best method. Accidents resulting in loss of product are uncommon and even then, a cleanup of one or two spilled tank cars can be handled quickly compared to an underground pipeline rupture that releases untold amounts of oil underground before the problem is caught and corrected.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

I think this is a smart move. CaliforniaPeggy May 2013 #1
I live in the Panhandle . . . Anymouse May 2013 #2
This strategy presumes that Keystone has not yet acquired easements... wercal May 2013 #3
K&R!! felix_numinous May 2013 #4
K&R! limpyhobbler May 2013 #5
Concerning Easements Anymouse May 2013 #6
I heard 2-days ago from Canadians working with XL groups that movement of tar sands oil txwhitedove Jun 2013 #7
They don't move tar, they move crude oil Socialistlemur Jun 2013 #9
Rail or truck . . . Anymouse Jun 2013 #8
Rail and truck are being used massively Socialistlemur Jun 2013 #10
Actually, moving asphalt by rail is very common Not Sure Jun 2013 #12
Silly idea Socialistlemur Jun 2013 #11
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»A Novel Way to Fight the ...»Reply #12