Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Sirveri

(4,517 posts)
3. Cap and trade is arguably one of the most cost effective reductive mechanisms available.
Wed Jun 5, 2013, 07:03 PM
Jun 2013

at least according to that program and the research the put into it.

But since it's a game you can pick what you want and how you want to achieve emissions reductions. You can annihilate emissions (90% reduction) for a measly ten billion dollars in the most prosperous state in the union (we're something like 9-11% of the US GDP). That's food for thought, we could cut US National greenhouse emission by 90% for 100-200 Billion dollars if it scales properly (not all of which would be borne by the government, large amounts come from individuals and businesses). Which is a third of the defense budget for a single year, and it would create massive employment opportunities during the retrofit.

The thing I like about these 'games' that next 10 releases is that they source their research so you can delve deeper into the subject if you choose to do so. A large number of their data points appear to come from a non-profit group called blue sky. So you can dig and find an agenda. It's also a mildly entertaining way to get a little bit more education about the subject and potentially expose others to it.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The California Carbon Cha...»Reply #3