Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Iterate

(3,020 posts)
3. Beats me.
Tue Jun 25, 2013, 06:48 PM
Jun 2013

I've never thought about the growth rate of those three that way.

50 years after WWI, 25 after WWII? I know wars can have some serious knock-on effects that keep echoing. It's also about the same time that rebuilding after WWII was largely completed. If that's part of it, similar numbers for China should be shifted later by about five years, because it ended later for them and they had the famine from '58 to '61.

It's also about the time full employment ended world-wide. Cause or effect?

Energy and WDP were far more linked then, so you might be counting the same activity twice. Maybe??

Or it was because the Beatles broke up. That, and the near certainty that if you write a book called "The Population Bomb" you will learn on the publication date that the growth rate had already peaked.

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Global Energy, GWP and Po...»Reply #3