Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

oldhippie

(3,249 posts)
3. I like the solar sail tanker, but .......
Fri Jun 28, 2013, 06:16 PM
Jun 2013

... a little back of the envelope math says ....



.... it's gonna be tough.

Let's see, Wiki says that the Alaska Class VLCC (typical big oil tanker) has a 31,658 BHP diesel engine for propulsion. That's equivalent to 23.6 MW of electrical power. So it needs a 23.6 MW solar array to power it. A 23.6 MW solar array would cover about 2 million sq ft (if you could point it directly at the sun.) But the whole ship is only 987 ft long and has beam of 166 ft. Even with some cool cantilevering you might get about 164K sq ft, or about 2 MW of solar power.

So, the total ship covered with solar panels would give it less than 10% of the power it needs to move at it's current rate. You would probably have to sit somewhere in the ocean with good sun for 12 sun hours or so (two days of actual time), figure out a way to store that energy (in heavy batteries, maybe?) and then you could move for about an hour before you ran out of energy.

That's gonna be really hard to compete with just burning a small bit of the cargo to power the diesel engine continuously.

But I'm sure the Church of the Renewables will find a way to make it work.

(Disclaimer - I just did that math on my iPhone calculator after two glasses of wine before dinner. I hope I didn't screw up too bad! )

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»The Future of Solar and W...»Reply #3