Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cprise

(8,445 posts)
10. This scepticism may be justified
Fri Jul 26, 2013, 10:57 AM
Jul 2013

They appear to be using a counter argument based on paleoclimate (i.e. such a release doesn't show up in the ice cores at these levels of ocean surface exposure).

OTOH, Wadams et al are using models to project the future.

Its possible the modelers are closer to the truth if the *rate* and temp starting point of warming make a significant difference, because the current rate is unprecedented especially from a cool, more methane-laden period like ours. A past warming event at a gradual rate allows the biosphere to head-off methane buildup, storing that carbon as other forms.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Large, Troubling Methane ...»Reply #10