Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

Politicalboi

(15,189 posts)

3. We do need better ideas

Reply to NickB79 (Reply #2)

Fri Jul 26, 2013, 03:32 PM

Jul 2013

When it comes to infrastructure. I'm not for nukes. We better start to think about where we can channel rising waters and soon if possible. Instead of water being the enemy in a storm, make it work for us if possible. I'm sure it won't be fail safe all the time, but it's something to think about in the very near future.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

5 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Global warming to cut snow water storage 56 percent in Oregon watershed [View all] OKIsItJustMe Jul 2013 OP

Instead of piping toxic sludge AKA Keystone Pipeline Politicalboi Jul 2013 #1

Too energy-intensive NickB79 Jul 2013 #2

We do need better ideas Politicalboi Jul 2013 #3

I expect it will be easier to move people than water NickB79 Jul 2013 #5

This is getting personal ... but not unexpected. DreamGypsy Jul 2013 #4