Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)Intermittency Of Renewables?… Not So Much [View all]
http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/21/intermittency-of-renewable-energy/Below was a great summary (if a bit simplified in parts) comment from one of our readers on one of our posts last week. I thought it deserved a few more eyes. Also, I happened to go back to a roundtable discussion of utility CEOs today that supports the overall the intermittency of renewable energy issue is overhyped argument. More on that below the reader comment.
<snip>
First, the then CEO and President of Florida Power & Light, Armando Olivera, chimed in. I spent a lot of time in operations in our company. Of all the things that I worry about, regulating using solar, or renewables, really doesnt worry me. I think you gotta be at a really huge scale of solar before that becomes an issue. And in the meantime, weve got a lot of enabling technology going into these grids about half of the meters at FPL are already automated devices. We are learning a huge were seeing benefits that we didnt fully anticipate in terms of managing the grid. Were also putting in a lot of smart technology that can adjust at a very local level whenever theres a problem. So, you know, I think theres a huge foundation thats being laid out today that will facilitate all of these technologies .
Doyle Beneby, President & CEO of CPS Energy, backed him up. Yeah, I would agree with Armando, I dont worry about that at all . Generally, if youve got automated meters, if youve got the means for a home area network, I think you can easily reduce demand to follow I call it load-following for solar. What we found, also, is that there are a very discreet set of customers out there who would volunteer to have their load reduced to follow the drop in output for solar . So I think thats a big opportunity out (there) for us. I really think concerns about the grid, so to speak, and even to a degree intermittency, should not at all impede the progress of solar.
Robert Powers, President of AEP Utilities, also chimed in and said, I agree with my colleague that near-term theres no, no issue with grid stability with deploying solar.
<more>
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why are you arguing about a theoretical problem that could only possibly occur
BlueStreak
Jul 2013
#16
"no compelling reason ever to build (or extend) any nuclear or coal plant -- ever"
kristopher
Jul 2013
#44
The economics of storage systems get better as we shift to intermittent sources
BlueStreak
Jul 2013
#65
That 300% is a nonsense number, for a case that will never exist in the real world
BlueStreak
Jul 2013
#29