Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)Intermittency Of Renewables?… Not So Much [View all]
http://cleantechnica.com/2013/07/21/intermittency-of-renewable-energy/Below was a great summary (if a bit simplified in parts) comment from one of our readers on one of our posts last week. I thought it deserved a few more eyes. Also, I happened to go back to a roundtable discussion of utility CEOs today that supports the overall the intermittency of renewable energy issue is overhyped argument. More on that below the reader comment.
<snip>
First, the then CEO and President of Florida Power & Light, Armando Olivera, chimed in. I spent a lot of time in operations in our company. Of all the things that I worry about, regulating using solar, or renewables, really doesnt worry me. I think you gotta be at a really huge scale of solar before that becomes an issue. And in the meantime, weve got a lot of enabling technology going into these grids about half of the meters at FPL are already automated devices. We are learning a huge were seeing benefits that we didnt fully anticipate in terms of managing the grid. Were also putting in a lot of smart technology that can adjust at a very local level whenever theres a problem. So, you know, I think theres a huge foundation thats being laid out today that will facilitate all of these technologies .
Doyle Beneby, President & CEO of CPS Energy, backed him up. Yeah, I would agree with Armando, I dont worry about that at all . Generally, if youve got automated meters, if youve got the means for a home area network, I think you can easily reduce demand to follow I call it load-following for solar. What we found, also, is that there are a very discreet set of customers out there who would volunteer to have their load reduced to follow the drop in output for solar . So I think thats a big opportunity out (there) for us. I really think concerns about the grid, so to speak, and even to a degree intermittency, should not at all impede the progress of solar.
Robert Powers, President of AEP Utilities, also chimed in and said, I agree with my colleague that near-term theres no, no issue with grid stability with deploying solar.
<more>
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
65 replies, 8592 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
65 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why are you arguing about a theoretical problem that could only possibly occur
BlueStreak
Jul 2013
#16
"no compelling reason ever to build (or extend) any nuclear or coal plant -- ever"
kristopher
Jul 2013
#44
The economics of storage systems get better as we shift to intermittent sources
BlueStreak
Jul 2013
#65
That 300% is a nonsense number, for a case that will never exist in the real world
BlueStreak
Jul 2013
#29