Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
Environment & Energy
Showing Original Post only (View all)Lying With Charts, Global Warming Edition [View all]
http://motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2012/01/lying-charts-global-warming-editionn my email today, the Washington Times passes along some great news: "Global warming trend ended in 1997, new data shows." The link is to a piece in the Daily Mail that, sure enough, tells us that our real worry isn't warming, it's the possibility of the Thames freezing over. And to prove that the world is no longer heating up, they include one of my all-time favorite graphs. I've recreated it using NASA data:

Look! No warming trend! But do you see the problem? I've given you a hint by embedding the 1997-2011 data within a larger chart, instead of just producing it on its own, as the Mail did. So that should make things pretty obvious. But in case you need a bigger hint, click the link for the full set of data, not cherry-picked to begin with the huge El Niño spike of 1998.
Hey look! The warming trend is back!

82 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"Global Warming Has Stopped"? How to Fool People Using "Cherry-Picked" Climate Data
OKIsItJustMe
Feb 2012
#14
Riddle me this: why, then, is the arctic ice in severe decline, as is shown in this graph?
XemaSab
Feb 2012
#16
You have not indicated how much warming you believe we will see over the next 100 years.
joshcryer
Feb 2012
#48
I am a firm believer that this is happening and it's gonna be hardcore when it really hits
XemaSab
Feb 2012
#51
Inflection points and non-linear responses are common discussion topics in climate change circles.
GliderGuider
Feb 2012
#26
I used it in relation to particular behviours of the system, not the system overall.
GliderGuider
Feb 2012
#40
The term "massive" is subjective. Obviously I can only make a persuasive argument.
joshcryer
Feb 2012
#49
Given the uncertainties in modeling I think it's fairer to go with the spread.
joshcryer
Feb 2012
#73