Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

FBaggins

(28,706 posts)
22. It remains to be seen?
Thu Aug 1, 2013, 08:56 PM
Aug 2013
it remains to be seen whether Germany will increase its consumption of coal power in the process ...

It's exactly what has been happening (despite protestations to the contrary). What "remains to be seen" is whether or not they can stem the bleeding any time soon.

You can play games with strawmen about whether individual plants were a response to one thing or another... but coal plants really aren't a problem... it's the coal they burn.

And there's no way to dodge that (just as predicted - despite your strawmen to the contrary) their consumption of coal is up dramatically as a direct result of the nuclear shutdown.

They are on track with their infrastructure to meet those goals.

Nice (and so artfully crafted) spin. They were well ahead of "on track" until their 2011 error. They've only gone backwards since then.

edited wrong post

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

. wtmusic Jul 2013 #1
German emissions down 25.5% since 1990, US emisions up 5% bananas Jul 2013 #2
Thank you. mbperrin Jul 2013 #3
Really, bananas? NickB79 Aug 2013 #4
Are you SERIOUSLY making the claim kristopher Aug 2013 #5
Are you seriously going to dismiss two years of back-to-back carbon increases? NickB79 Aug 2013 #6
You bet your sweet ass I am. kristopher Aug 2013 #7
Then you've gone round the bend. FBaggins Aug 2013 #8
You haven't been right about a single thing since this started. kristopher Aug 2013 #10
Oh my, oh my NickB79 Aug 2013 #15
So let me get this straight kristopher Aug 2013 #16
It remains to be seen? FBaggins Aug 2013 #22
You mean that your strawman has been wrong all along? FBaggins Aug 2013 #24
The German Greens are seriously making that claim because it is true Yo_Mama Aug 2013 #13
"this increases the need for stabilizing power" NickB79 Aug 2013 #14
Baseload, reactive, etc Yo_Mama Aug 2013 #21
It is always worth looking at what you leave out kristopher Aug 2013 #17
Except, Kristopher, that Germany passed a law preventing these shutdowns when necessary Yo_Mama Aug 2013 #25
Close... but not quite FBaggins Aug 2013 #27
It's amazing how short-sighted you can be FBaggins Aug 2013 #26
Since 1990? FBaggins Aug 2013 #9
They decided to eliminate nuclear power in 2000 kristopher Aug 2013 #11
And changed it after that FBaggins Aug 2013 #12
I haven't ignored it kristopher Aug 2013 #18
What you keep forgetting... FBaggins Aug 2013 #19
Not at all kristopher Aug 2013 #20
Lol! FBaggins Aug 2013 #23
Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Merkel’s Green Shift (sic...»Reply #22