Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

OKIsItJustMe

(21,875 posts)
10. Gas, sealed beneath a layer of basalt
Tue Aug 6, 2013, 07:07 PM
Aug 2013

It all works in the lab, so, now they’re doing field testing in the real world.

This is a good thing.™

Let’s say the worst happens. There is a catastrophic failure, and every bit of the CO[font size="1"]2[/font] escapes into the atmosphere (where it would have been, had it not been captured in the first place.)

I’m hard pressed to see how this is a bad thing. Oh, yes, I know, “People will think they can burn all the coal they want, because the CO[font size="1"]2[/font] is being captured.” (Right?)

Well, no, I don’t think this will lead to increased burning of coal, because any way you look at it, this process means additional expense, making alternative sources look even more attractive by comparison.

Right now, the price of coal-fired electricity is artificially low, because we aren’t requiring people to pay for the carbon emissions that result. In effect, this plan will.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

Latest Discussions»Issue Forums»Environment & Energy»Field test could lead to ...»Reply #10