Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

(21,088 posts)

12. CCS won't help that. It's designed to work with concentrated CO2 collected at source IIRC.

Tue Aug 6, 2013, 07:35 PM

Aug 2013

To take it back out of the air after we release it we'd need old what's-his-name's balloons, with CO2 chillers on board. Or somefink.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

18 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

And compressed gas underground *could* leak back out ... eppur_se_muova Aug 2013 #1

You�re missed the whole point of this approach OKIsItJustMe Aug 2013 #3

Yes ... react *slowly*. eppur_se_muova Aug 2013 #9

Gas, sealed beneath a layer of basalt OKIsItJustMe Aug 2013 #10

Well stated. kristopher Aug 2013 #17

That's the point of using this particular geology Yo_Mama Aug 2013 #5

I can't help but think GliderGuider Aug 2013 #2

Right, much better to do nothing. OKIsItJustMe Aug 2013 #4

Actually, I think it is. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #6

No, I'd go and do something else with my energy. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #8

CCS had better be on the menu OKIsItJustMe Aug 2013 #11

CCS actually can help reduce carbon OKIsItJustMe Aug 2013 #13

Good luck with it. GliderGuider Aug 2013 #14

Well, we might suspect it is your math that is at fault OKIsItJustMe Aug 2013 #16

Post removed Post removed Aug 2013 #18