Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

kristopher

(29,798 posts)

4. Bellefonte was IN ADDITION TO the coal, not instead of.

Reply to pscot (Reply #2)

Fri Aug 16, 2013, 12:56 PM

Aug 2013

When are you going to get it through your head that the economics of nuclear Reinforce the economics of coal?

If you want to shut down coal plants, spend the Bellefonte money on solar and wind. Their output will steal market share from coal and push the coal plants into the red, eventually shutting them down.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

9 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Another wheel falls off the nuclear revival bandwagon [View all] kristopher Aug 2013 OP

Need Zombie Killer Tactics for Really Bad Ideas in USA Demeter Aug 2013 #1

Especially if it's corporate welfare. nt kristopher Aug 2013 #6

The Scherer, Bowen and Miller power plants pscot Aug 2013 #2

Neither the company's spin nor kris' has it right. FBaggins Aug 2013 #3

All of which = Wheels Falling Off Nuclear Revival Bandwagon kristopher Aug 2013 #5

I thought Capt. Nuclear was going to save us from fossil fuels. cprise Aug 2013 #9

Bellefonte was IN ADDITION TO the coal, not instead of. kristopher Aug 2013 #4

I would bet Southern Company has more money for lobbyists than TVA PuffedMica Aug 2013 #7

Nope kristopher Aug 2013 #8