Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Environment & Energy

PDJane

(10,103 posts)

16. Actually, we do. But it's ok, denial is a fine place for you.

Reply to wtmusic (Reply #15)

Wed Aug 21, 2013, 08:37 PM

Aug 2013

The load of radiation is increasing, and low-level, constant radiation is as dangerous as large bursts of the stuff. That's been known for decades; large bursts mean that the dna can repair itself. Low level radiation mean it doesn't.

We're not good at seeing what is there. Yes, the powers that be said his cancer wasn't from radiation. That's meant to be comforting, but I don't believe it. Rokke's group got sick very quickly, and the deaths from DU in Iraq are continuing to increase.

It's a stupid thing to play with, as is tar sands and fracking. We need to wise up, or get better at being Gods.

Edit history

Please sign in to view edit histories.

Recommendations

0 members have recommended this reply (displayed in chronological order):

17 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Nuclear Energy Development and Slowing Climate Change [View all] wtmusic Aug 2013 OP

There were, are, and will be deaths from Fukishima. PDJane Aug 2013 #1

18,000 humans were killed by coal today. phantom power Aug 2013 #2

And this makes the birth defects from nuclear, as opposed to renewable resources, OK? PDJane Aug 2013 #4

Do you have peer-reviewed evidence of birth defects from nuclear power? wtmusic Aug 2013 #6

Radiation-induced cancer takes years to appear. wtmusic Aug 2013 #8

Actually, depending on where and how the exposure occurred, the cancers can appear within months, PDJane Aug 2013 #10

There is nothing here, Jane. wtmusic Aug 2013 #15

Actually, we do. But it's ok, denial is a fine place for you. PDJane Aug 2013 #16

All controversy aside, it's a rather sad story how our fears prevented our deployment of safer tech. NYC_SKP Aug 2013 #3

"Our fears" didn't prevent anything kristopher Aug 2013 #5

Sure they did. Our fears have prevented and continue to prevent all manner of progress. NYC_SKP Aug 2013 #7

The effort you made was appreciated kristopher Aug 2013 #9

Elon Musk was honest - he didn't blame "fear", he said "It's super-damn hard." bananas Aug 2013 #13

What prevented GM and Ford from pursuing hybrids and EVs? NYC_SKP Aug 2013 #14

Please don't fall for the hype and historical revisionism. bananas Aug 2013 #11

As I said in my reply, thermal plants can be and must be eliminated. NYC_SKP Aug 2013 #12

It's utterly bizarre. PDJane Aug 2013 #17